eCoC EU
Request Review
EUCARIS and National Access Points

Prepare your eCoC NAP submission workflow

An eCoC submission needs a complete vehicle record, a suitable signed IVI XML file and an authorised manufacturer route. eCoC EU connects preparation and submission tracking so your team can follow what is ready, what was sent and what needs attention.

Highlights

Three responsibilities to establish before submission

Manufacturer

Owns vehicle and approval data, access authorisation and the decision to release the certificate.

Platform

Supports record preparation, XML generation, validation, signing coordination and submission status within the agreed implementation.

Authority route

Defines connection, authentication and receipt requirements. EUCARIS supports the exchange of IVI information between authorities.

How a National Access Point fits into EUCARIS

A National Access Point is a manufacturer-facing entry route for electronic CoC data. EUCARIS explains that Member States do not all need to operate their own NAP: an authority may also receive IVI information through international exchange. The destination registration country therefore does not automatically mean a separate manufacturer integration.

Confirm the selected access point, supported message version, authentication method and current onboarding instructions before planning delivery. A general statement that a platform supports EUCARIS does not establish your manufacturer's access or acceptance.

A practical submission sequence

  1. Identify the vehicle category, approval context and intended route.
  2. Complete the manufacturer registration and arrange the credentials required by that route.
  3. Prepare a representative vehicle record and validate the applicable IVI XML.
  4. Apply the agreed electronic signing or sealing process after the data checks.
  5. Test submission and retain both the payload reference and the authority response.
  6. Assign an owner to rejected records and follow the documented correction procedure.

Keep delivery status separate from acceptance

A request leaving your system is an event, not proof that the certificate was accepted. Design the rollout review around the response that the receiving service actually returns. The Submission Center provides the operational place to follow records; the route-specific response remains the evidence for the next action.

For repeated failures, classify the problem first: vehicle data, XML structure, signing, authentication or receiving-service response. This keeps the correction with the responsible team and avoids recreating an otherwise valid vehicle record.

What to bring to an implementation review

Prepare your intended access point, approval and vehicle scope, expected volume, data sources and the people responsible for signing and submission. Use a representative scenario for the initial discussion; exchange confidential records and credentials only through an agreed onboarding channel.

The review should produce a written map of prerequisites, supported operations, testing responsibilities and response handling. Add further routes only after the first scoped workflow is understood.

NAP submission questions

Do we need a NAP integration for every registration country?

Not automatically. EUCARIS enables authority exchange, and the manufacturer's chosen NAP and approval context determine the initial delivery route. Confirm the applicable arrangements with the relevant authority.

Does a successful XML validation mean the NAP will accept it?

No. Schema validation, data rules, electronic signing, authentication and the receiving authority's response are separate checks.

Is UK VCA submission part of this NAP route?

The UK VCA process is handled separately. Use the UK-specific IVI and account requirements when planning that workflow.

Official sources

Source checked on . Consult the latest authority guidance for your implementation.

Related resources

Check the data and trust steps

Continue with the part of the workflow your team needs to evaluate.

eCoC software

The complete manufacturer workflow and evaluation checklist.

Plan your manufacturer submission route Share the vehicle scope and intended access point. We can review the prerequisites and demonstrate the relevant workflow.
Request a workflow demo